Resources
Can Pets Be Tax Dependents? An Unusual Lawsuit Explores
If you’ve ever scrutinized your pet’s expenses and thought, “This furry companion is like my child,” you’re not alone. In a bold legal move, one attorney is advocating for this perspective in a federal court.
Back in December 2025, New York attorney Amanda Reynolds initiated a lawsuit against the IRS, seeking the recognition of her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, as a legal dependent under federal tax law.
This case, while seemingly whimsical, raises a poignant question: Are pet expenses deductible? And if not, why is this the case?
Here's an examination of the lawsuit, existing tax law specifics, and scenarios where tax benefits for animals do apply.
The Lawsuit: Claiming a Canine Dependent
In her legal documentation, Reynolds contends that Finnegan qualifies as a dependent based on IRS standards:
He resides with her year-round,
He lacks any income, and
She covers more than half his maintenance costs (noting expenses surpassing $5,000 annually for essential needs like food, healthcare, and care services).
As detailed in a national news coverage, Reynolds argues, “Functionally, Finnegan is comparable to a child, thus qualifying as a ‘dependent’.”
Additionally, she presents constitutional arguments, suggesting these tax provisions discriminatorily differentiate based on "species" (an Equal Protection claim) and assert that the lack of tax recognition constitutes an unauthorized "taking" under the Fifth Amendment.
Current Status of the Case
The proceedings are currently in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. For now, they’re in a holding pattern.
A federal magistrate judge has paused discovery (halting evidence exchange) while the IRS prepares a dismissal motion.
In the court's order, the lawsuit is noted as posing a “novel yet pressing query” regarding the potential for domestic pets to be recognized as tax dependents. However, the judge indicates significant challenges with the merits, suggesting the claims appear "unfounded at face value" and potentially unable to withstand dismissal.
So while the case is indeed active and attracting attention, the court's stance remains skeptical.
Why Pets Aren’t Recognized as Dependents
The core issue lies here: tax law identifies dependents as “individuals.”
Under the Internal Revenue Code Section 152, a dependent is a “qualifying child” or a “qualifying relative,” where the emphasis on “individual” has traditionally been interpreted as a human.
This is why current IRS documentation excludes pets as dependents. Dependents require Social Security or taxpayer ID numbers, with related credits and deductions centered around human family relationships.
Hence, despite Reynolds’ assertion that Finnegan qualifies based on functional dependency (no income, living arrangement, financial support), the current tax code does not classify animals as dependent “individuals.”
Existing Tax Breaks for Animals
Despite general restrictions on deducting pet costs, certain situations allow for notable exceptions. This is a key segment for readers, providing practical tax insights.
1) Service animals may be eligible for medical deductions
Costs related to a certified service animal aiding with a disability can qualify as medical expenses if you itemize deductions.
The IRS guidelines note that medical expenses must be itemized and surpass a certain AGI threshold to qualify. Expenses for obtaining, training, and maintaining a service animal are considered medical when directly linked to medical care.
Important note for readers: Emotional support animals, generally, do not meet service animal criteria under federal regulations; service animals are specifically trained for tasks associated with a disability.
2) Business animals may qualify as business deductions
In certain cases, an animal may have a legitimate business role—for instance:
A guard dog protecting business premises, or
Animals employed in pest control within a business environment.
Such instances allow ongoing costs to be ordinary and necessary business expenses, but documentation and a legitimate business intent are essential.
The source references this as one of the limited scenarios where IRS-approved tax breaks for animals apply.
3) Charitable deductions for fostering animals
Taxpayers who foster animals for approved organizations may be eligible to deduct specific unreimbursed costs as charitable contributions—always with strict adherence to rules and documentation.
The Taxpayer Implications
This lawsuit resonates emotionally—pets are indeed family to many Americans, and their care costs are substantial. However, tax law is a domain of definitions, not emotions.
Remember:
Dogs or cats cannot be claimed as dependents on federal tax returns.
Standard pet-related expenses such as food, grooming, or routine veterinary care for household pets typically are not deductible.
Certain animal-associated costs can be deducted under specific circumstances, such as for service animals, some business-use animals, or, occasionally, foster-related charitable costs.
While it’s unpredictable if the IRS will start acknowledging golden retrievers as dependents, this lawsuit underlines the practical and emotional dependence on pets by many families and highlights the existing stark divide between tax policy's definition of "family" versus "property."
This matter also serves as a valuable reminder: before deeming expenses as deductible, always cross-reference with IRS criteria to verify eligibility.
NEVER MISS A STORY.
Sign up for our newsletters and get our articles delivered right to your inbox.