Resources

December 2, 2025

Tax Considerations for Scam Victims: Maximizing Deductions

Navigating the tax landscape for scams and theft losses is intricate, especially with legislative shifts confining casualty and theft deductions to disaster-related events. However, if you've been defrauded, there remains a crucial tax path open to you.

Historically, tax legislation allowed for deductions of theft losses not covered by insurance. Yet, amended laws have narrowed these confines, primarily tying deductions to disasters. Still, the tax code offers a prospect under specific conditions. The provision under Internal Revenue Code Section 165(c)(2) is pivotal for those scammed under profit-motivated transactions.

This code specifies deductible losses in profit-geared activities. Thus, if you've faced financial setbacks from a scam tied to profit-generating intents, your losses may be deductible without needing disaster status. Awareness of this exception can be a vital relief for reclaiming some financial losses due to deceit.

Eligibility Criteria for Profit-Oriented Theft Losses: Several strict guidelines govern the eligibility for deductions under the profit-centric exception:

Profit Motive: The central intent must be economic gain. The IRS requires unambiguous evidence of a genuine profit expectation, necessitating comprehensive documentation, substantiated by case law and IRS directives.
Transaction Type: Qualifying transactions often include traditional investments, like securities or real estate. Transactions devoid of profit motive, particularly personal or social, are typically excluded.
Loss Nature: The loss must be inextricably linked to profit-geared transactions. Evident correlation through fiscal and legal documentation is essential, such as in investment or financial fraud instances.

IRS Guidelines: Deciphering deductible loss frequently involves IRS memoranda and rulings. A notable IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum (CCM 202511015) elaborates on deductible loss situations:

Investment Scams: Investments deceitful in nature may yet qualify as deductible if made with credible profit expectations. Documentation, such as scammer communications, investment contracts, and monetary proof, supports this legitimacy.
Theft Losses: These are scrutinized closely by the IRS, with a necessity for profit-oriented transaction origins, separate from non-commercial engagements.

Complex Tax Consequences:

Withdrawal from IRAs or tax-deferred pensions under scams entails substantial tax outcomes, dependent on account type—traditional or Roth.

For traditional IRAs, premature withdrawals due to scams generally count as taxable income, possibly escalating your tax bracket and liabilities. Step underage withdrawals face a 10% early penalty, compounding financial pressure.

Roth IRAs or Roth-qualified plans offer lesser immediate tax hits due to post-tax contributions. Generally adhering to the five-year rule, contributions can be tax- and penalty-free withdrawals, though premature earnings withdrawals, devoid of qualifying reasons, are taxed and penalized.

The scenarios below illustrate when scams qualify or disqualify as casualty loss, emphasizing theft qualification requires no reasonable recovery prospect.

Example 1: Impersonation Scam - Qualifies as Loss

Taxpayer 1 was deceived by an impersonator posing as a "fraud specialist," moving IRA and non-IRA funds into scammer-controlled foreign accounts. The insight points to taxpayer intent—safety and reinvestment motives, marking profit-oriented intentions and qualifying theft loss.

Tax Considerations:

If itemized deductions are possible, the loss becomes deductible on Schedule A.
However, taxes apply to traditional IRA distributions with recognizable gains or losses on non-IRA accounts. If the taxpayer is under 59.5, a 10% penalty arises without exception.
If resources allow, replenishing IRA within 60 days bypasses additional applicable taxes or penalties.

Example 2: Romance Scam - Non-Deductible Loss

Taxpayer 2 fell for a romance scam, led by emotional connection rather than profit. The absence of investment intent means losses fall under Section 165(c)(3), remaining non-deductible without disaster declaration.

Tax Outcomes:

No deductions permitted, but taxes on traditional IRA withdrawals apply, with gains or losses recognized for non-IRA accounts. Below age 59.5, a 10% IRA penalty exists unless reinvested within limit.

Example 3: Kidnapping Scam - Non-Deductible Loss

In a kidnapping scam, Taxpayer 3 was misled into transferring funds for safety assurances. The interpersonal motives lack profit impetus, thus non-deductible, aligning taxation with the Romance Scam example.

Key Takeaways: Intention clarity and transaction nature critically assess deductible scam-linked losses.

Documentation & Intent: Maintaining investment-focused documentation is crucial for profit-motive claims.
Compliance & Scrutiny: IRS focus on non-disaster losses demands diligent adherence to qualifying standards.

Consult with this office upon receiving dubious emails or messages before fund transfers. Our advice can be pivotal in fraud prevention. Educating vulnerable family, especially the elderly, guards against scams. Proactive measures ensure both asset safety and peace of mind.

Share this article...

Facebook

Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

NEVER MISS A STORY.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Social Media

Martinez & Shanken, PLLC

1560 W Warner Rd Suite 200
Gilbert, Arizona 85233

(480) 732-9977

mail@aztaxcpa.com

Martinez & Shanken PLLC We love to chat!

Feel free to use Ai Chat or Contact Us

Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Mobile Number

Message *