Resources
The 100% Tax Threat for U.S. Athletes: Breaking Down the OLYMPICS Act
What occurs when an American athlete captures a gold medal while wearing the colors of a rival nation? The answer used to be mostly a matter of sports trivia. Soon, however, it might carry staggering financial consequences.
Introduced in March 2026, a sweeping new federal proposal in Congress seeks to levy a 100% excise tax on specific earnings of U.S. citizens and permanent residents who compete internationally on behalf of a select group of foreign governments.
At Martinez & Shanken PLLC, our Gilbert CPA team frequently helps small business owners navigate complex global income issues, but this proposed legislation takes cross-border taxation to an entirely new extreme. In simple terms: some athletes could be forced to forfeit every single dollar they earn.
Inside the Proposed OLYMPICS Act
Formally introduced as the Officially Limiting Yearly Money Procured by Individuals Concerning Sportmanship (OLYMPICS) Act, this bill proposes creating an unprecedented new excise tax equal to 100% of income earned from the following streams:
Participating in international athletic competitions
Direct tournament or event prize money
Sponsorship and endorsement revenue explicitly tied to representing that nation
Currently, lawmakers have drafted the bill to target athletes representing four specific countries:
China
Russia
Iran
North Korea
However, future legislative amendments could easily broaden the scope to impact any competitor representing another nation. If passed, the tax would apply strictly to major global platforms, including the Olympics, the World Cup, and similar elite international tournaments.
The Financial Catalyst Behind the Proposal
Legislation of this magnitude rarely materializes without a clear catalyst. The upcoming 2026 Winter Olympics have placed renewed focus on the financial incentives behind national representation. Eileen Gu, a U.S.-born snowboarder competing for China, is one prominent athlete who would likely face massive tax liabilities under this proposal, assuming it progresses beyond the committee phase.
Gu represents a high-profile case study of American athletes pursuing lucrative opportunities abroad, drawing attention largely due to the sheer financial volume of her arrangements:
She reportedly earned millions in payments tied to Olympic performance from Chinese authorities
Over several years, those payments totaled nearly $14 million in government-linked support
She also earned over $20 million annually from endorsements and sponsorships
A Common Practice in Global Sports
While Gu’s situation captures international headlines, shifting national allegiances is a well-established practice in global sports. Athletes frequently switch their represented flag for several valid reasons:
Holding dual citizenship or honoring deep family heritage
Finding greater opportunity to qualify for highly competitive rosters
Gaining access to superior athletic funding, coaching, or sponsorships
Making strategic, long-term career decisions
For many, the decision involves finding a team they might not otherwise qualify for in the U.S. We see this frequently across various disciplines. Golfer Rory McIlroy represents Ireland in the Ryder Cup and Olympics despite his U.S.-based PGA Tour career. In basketball, stars like Joel Embiid have weighed multiple national team options, while Luka Dončić competes for Slovenia while starring in the NBA. Track and field features similar mobility, such as Bernard Lagat, who successfully competed for both Kenya and the United States.
Navigating Existing International Tax Complexities
Even without the enforcement of the OLYMPICS Act, global earners already face steep, complicated reporting requirements. The United States maintains a unique system by taxing its citizens on worldwide income, regardless of physical residence.
Consequently, an athlete competing abroad might still owe robust U.S. taxes alongside obligations to the nation they compete for. This often creates severe double taxation issues, the resolution of which depends heavily on prevailing international treaties.
As one analysis notes, dual-national athletes can be subject to tax obligations in multiple countries at the same time.
Using Taxation as a Behavioral Lever
This congressional proposal highlights an accelerating trend: lawmakers using the tax code to actively steer behavior rather than solely to fund government operations. Municipalities use "sin taxes" on products like tobacco and alcohol to curb public consumption, while federal entities offer generous tax credits for electric vehicles to encourage green energy adoption.
Such policies bring forth several broader philosophical questions:
Should the tax code heavily regulate professional and personal decisions?
Where exactly is the dividing line between standard taxation and punitive financial penalty?
How do these strict tax policies intersect with citizenship rights and modern global mobility?
Practical Compliance and Future Takeaways
If the OLYMPICS Act passes, implementing a 100% tax rate on international athletes would undoubtedly be an administrative maze. Open compliance questions include how to properly track indirect sponsorship revenue, whether payments deliberately routed through foreign entities could be captured, and if individuals might sidestep the tax entirely by formally renouncing their U.S. citizenship.
Most taxpayers will never directly encounter the OLYMPICS Act. However, whether you are an elite snowboarder or a local small business owner operating out of Gilbert, the underlying principles are vital to remember:
U.S. citizens face taxation on global income.
International operations in any industry invite complex tax exposure.
Managing cross-border revenue involves serious structural planning.
The global tax landscape is deeply intertwined with geopolitical shifts.
In today's integrated economy, tax liabilities do not just follow your income—they follow you, regardless of where your opportunities lead. If you need assistance streamlining your small business accounting, managing multifaceted tax liabilities, or planning for upcoming filing deadlines, reach out to Martinez & Shanken PLLC to schedule a proactive tax planning consultation today.
NEVER MISS A STORY.
Sign up for our newsletters and get our articles delivered right to your inbox.