Over the last few years, digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins have transformed from niche interests into mainstream investments. With this adoption, however, tax reporting has grown significantly more complicated. Many investors entered the cryptocurrency market without realizing that their digital asset transactions often trigger taxable events, while some taxpayers intentionally avoided reporting certain trades.
Now, the IRS is making it clear that digital asset compliance is a primary enforcement priority.
The IRS is finalizing specific updates to its Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP) aimed squarely at digital asset noncompliance. While these revised procedures are awaiting final approval, they are designed to streamline the program and underscore the increasing importance of cryptocurrency enforcement.
If you have concerns about your past cryptocurrency reporting, you shouldn't ignore this development—but you also shouldn't panic. Depending on your specific situation, there are still opportunities to correct prior reporting issues voluntarily before the IRS reaches out to you.
For a long time, many cryptocurrency transactions happened with minimal third-party reporting. That landscape is rapidly shifting.
Congress and the IRS have progressively expanded the reporting requirements for digital assets, with broker reporting on Form 1099-DA marking another major move toward total transparency. As the IRS receives more direct information, matching your tax returns against reported cryptocurrency transactions becomes straightforward.
This doesn't mean every single cryptocurrency owner is going to face an audit, nor does it imply that a simple reporting mistake will turn into a severe tax disaster. It does mean, however, that taxpayers with significant reporting discrepancies need to understand the IRS has more data at its disposal than ever before.
Hoping the IRS simply overlooks a reporting issue is becoming an increasingly risky approach.
The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program exists for taxpayers who wish to proactively disclose prior tax noncompliance before the IRS flags the issue.
Essentially, the VDP provides a pathway to come forward, report previously undisclosed tax matters, pay the owed tax, interest, and relevant penalties, and potentially avoid a recommendation for criminal prosecution.
However, one detail is absolutely vital: the program does not grant automatic immunity from criminal prosecution. The IRS explicitly states in its guidance that acceptance into the VDP does not guarantee criminal charges will never happen.
Even so, voluntary disclosure has historically served as a critical option for taxpayers facing serious compliance issues because it shows cooperation before the government independently uncovers the noncompliance.
The program's existence comes down to practical reality. The IRS generally benefits when taxpayers correct their own issues voluntarily, saving the government the time and resources required to uncover every instance of noncompliance through audits or criminal investigations.

A common misconception about the VDP is that anyone who made a tax return error should utilize it. That is simply not how the program operates.
The VDP is primarily intended for taxpayers whose past noncompliance may have been willful. Under tax law, "willful" generally means more than just a sincere mistake; it typically implies an intentional failure to meet known tax obligations.
In contrast, many cryptocurrency reporting issues stem from situations like:
While these situations likely require correction, they do not automatically mandate entry into the Voluntary Disclosure Program.
Selecting the wrong correction method can lead to unnecessary expenses and complications. This is why speaking with a qualified CPA is critical before taking any formal action.
The IRS initially proposed updates to the Voluntary Disclosure Program in late 2025, and those proposals are now advancing toward final implementation.
While the final procedures are not yet officially released, the proposed modifications include several key updates:
The overarching objective seems to be standardizing the process, making it easier to administer, and setting clearer expectations for taxpayers regarding timing and penalties.
Until the final guidance is issued, taxpayers should keep in mind that these procedures could still change.

The most critical element of any voluntary disclosure program is right in the name: the disclosure must actually be voluntary.
Once the IRS has initiated an examination, received documentation highlighting your noncompliance, or reached out to you regarding the issue, certain disclosure pathways may no longer be an option.
Because of this, if you know you have significant reporting concerns, you should not wait for an IRS notice to arrive in your Gilbert mailbox before seeking professional advice. Reviewing your situation now gives you far more flexibility than attempting to respond after the IRS has formally opened an examination.
It is important to dispel the belief that every cryptocurrency reporting problem leads to criminal charges. Fortunately, that is not the case.
Tax law draws distinct lines between innocent mistakes, negligence, substantial understatements, civil fraud, and criminal tax violations. These scenarios carry completely different legal standards.
Many taxpayers simply misunderstood the mechanics of reporting cryptocurrency. Others based their filings on incomplete transaction histories or flawed cost-basis data. Some were completely unaware that trading one cryptocurrency for another could trigger a taxable gain.
These circumstances still require amended returns or additional tax payments, but they are fundamentally different from intentionally hiding taxable income.
Because every situation relies on its own specific facts, you should avoid assuming that you are perfectly fine or that you immediately face criminal exposure. Both extremes are often incorrect.
As digital asset reporting expands, we anticipate taxpayers will have a growing list of questions, such as:
The answer to nearly all of these questions remains the same: it depends.
Tax reporting decisions must be grounded in your complete factual history. This includes evaluating the nature of your transactions, the tax years in question, the financial amount at stake, the documentation you have available, and whether the omissions were accidental or intentional.
There is rarely a single solution that works for everyone.
When discovering a reporting problem, many taxpayers immediately want to file amended returns. Sometimes, this is exactly the right move. Sometimes, it is not.
If you have potential criminal exposure, filing amended returns without first assessing all available correction strategies might not lead to the best result.
Conversely, jumping into the Voluntary Disclosure Program for a sincere reporting mistake could subject you to rigorous procedures designed for willful noncompliance.
The right approach requires a thorough understanding of the facts before any action is taken. The evaluation must come first; the paperwork comes second.
Cryptocurrency taxation has developed into one of the most technically demanding areas of individual and small business income tax reporting.
A single taxpayer might engage in transactions involving:
Every single one of these raises specific tax reporting questions.
When you combine that technical complexity with historical reporting problems, finding the right resolution requires much more than simply generating an amended tax return. It demands a careful evaluation of legal risks, available correction programs, existing documentation, and the long-term impacts of each choice.
The proposed revisions to the Voluntary Disclosure Program should be seen as part of a wider trend, rather than a standalone announcement.
In recent years, the IRS has steadily ramped up its focus on digital assets through:
The VDP modernization aligns perfectly with this broader compliance push.
If you have accurately reported all your cryptocurrency transactions, these developments simply underscore the need to maintain solid records. If you have unresolved reporting issues, they are a strong reminder to explore your options before the situation escalates.
The planned updates to the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program confirm that digital asset compliance is an ongoing priority. While we await final procedures, the proposed adjustments aim to streamline disclosures and set concrete rules for taxpayers looking to correct past noncompliance. Remember, not every cryptocurrency error demands a voluntary disclosure; honest mistakes are usually handled differently than willful evasion. The vital step is identifying the exact path that fits your circumstances before you take action.
If you own cryptocurrency and have concerns about your past reporting, now is the ideal time to act. Waiting for the IRS limits your choices. At Martinez & Shanken PLLC, our CPAs understand the nuances of digital asset taxation. If you have unreported crypto transactions, contact our Gilbert, AZ office today. We can review your filings, outline your options, and help you select the most effective strategy to resolve your tax issues.
Sign up for our newsletters and get our articles delivered right to your inbox.